My response to the VOCM question ' Should the province continue with fixed date elections?'

I do apologize for not posting more often, but I was pretty busy with going to MUNCF (MUN Christian Fellowship) last night: we did a manuscript Bible Study of Romans 13:1-19 in the Bible, talked with a leader of IV (Inter-varsity) Fellowship, worshipped God together, socialized and ate snacks together.
Hello everyone, here's my response to the VOCM question of the day, ' Should the province continue with fixed date elections?'

"I agree with Labrador MAINLANDER when he said that the current FPTP (First-past-the-post) system is flawed: in labrador, 51.5% of the popular voted for political parties other than the PCs and yet 75% of Labrador (3 seats out of 4) are held by the PCs!

Personally, I think we need to maintain fixed election dates, while introducing three new measures: 1.Give voters 3 votes per ballot: one for which leader (or independent candidate) would make the best Premier, one for a political party list and one for an MHA; 2. maintain fixed election dates, but introduce 'recall' legislation. If an MHA is caught spending taxpayers money in an illegaly matter, allow for a 'recall by-election' to be called: the first part of the ballot asking whether that MHA should no longer be the MHA and which MHA candidate should replace him or her and 3. allow for re-broadcasts of House of Assembly proceedings up to 1-2 months after a session ended and extend coverage of the HofA proceedings beyond cable to include satellite dishes,etc.. This way, our MHAs every words and actions cab be up for public scrutiny."